Showing posts with label samma ditthi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label samma ditthi. Show all posts

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Views Denying the Workings of Karma

Pa Auk Sayadaw (The Workings of Kamma, edited by Wisdom Quarterly)





Three Views that Deny Karma



There are three wrong views that deny the workings of karma and result:

  1. Inefficiency (akiriya) denies the workings of actions.
  2. Rootlessness (ahetuka) denies the root or cause of results.
  3. Non-Existence (natthika) denies the result of any cause.

INEFFICIENCY VIEW

This view denies the workings of unskillful and skillful actions. In the Buddha’s time, it was taught by Purana Kassapa. The Buddha explains how identity view (the belief in an enduring-self, denying egolessness) gives rise to such a wrong view:

"Meditators, when there is [one of the Five Aggregates of form, feeling, perception, mental formations, or] consciousness, by clinging to [it or to] consciousness, by adhering to [it or to] consciousness, such a view as [inefficiency] arises:

  • ‘If with a razor-rimmed wheel one were to make living beings of this Earth into one mass of flesh, into one heap of flesh, because of this there would be no wrongdoing and no outcome of wrongdoing.
  • 'If one were to go along the south bank of the Ganges River killing and slaughtering, mutilating and encouraging others to mutilate, torturing and encouraging others to torture, because of this there would be no wrongdoing and no outcome of wrongdoing.
  • 'If one were to go along the north bank of the Ganges offering gifts and encouraging others to give gifts, making offerings and encouraging others to make offerings, because of this there would be no merit and no outcome of merit.
  • 'By offering, by taming oneself, by self-control, by speaking truth, there is no merit and no outcome of merit.’"

This wrong view denies the efficiency [effectiveness] of unwholesome and wholesome actions, which is to deny the efficiency of karma.

ROOTLESSNESS VIEW

The rootlessness view holds that events are determined by fate, or by circumstance, or by nature (mere genetics or chance), denying that events have a root or cause. In the Buddha’s time this view was taught by Makkhali Gosala.

The Buddha explains how identity-view (the belief that there is a permanent soul or self) gives rise to such a wrong view: "When there is [form, feeling, perception, formations, or] consciousness, by clinging to consciousness, by adhering to consciousness, such a view as [rootlessness] arises:

  • ‘There is no root and there is no cause for the defilement of beings; without root and without cause beings are defiled.
  • 'There is no root and there is no cause for the purification of beings; without root and without cause beings are purified.
  • 'There is no power, there is no energy, there is no [supportive] strength, there is no [supportive] endurance.
  • 'All beings, all breathers, all creatures, all living beings, are without ability, without power, and without energy: molded by fate, circumstance, and nature, they experience pleasure and pain in the six classes.’"

The "six classes" of pleasure and pain taught here by Makkhali Gosala are a sixfold system of purification that he said has no cause either. This wrong view denies that events have a root or cause, which is to deny that there are causes such as karma.

NON-EXISTENCE VIEW

This view holds that only form [materiality, the body, physicality, corporeality] has true existence while denying that actions have any result.

For this reason, it denies also that there is rebirth, that there are other planes of existence, and denies that there are teachers such as the Buddha who know and see these things. In the Buddha’s time this view was taught by Ajita Kesakambali.

The Buddha explains how identity-view gives rise to such a wrong view: "When there is [form, feeling, perception, formations, or] consciousness, by clinging to consciousness, by adhering to consciousness, such a view as [nonexistence] arises:

  • 'There is no offering, there is no alms giving, there is no sacrifice; there is no fruit or result of skillful and unskillful karma; there is no this world, there is no other world; there is no [special significance to] mother, there is no father; there are no spontaneously born beings [being born without parents such as celestial and infernal beings]; there are not in the world any ascetics or brahmins, rightly faring, rightly practicing, who (with direct knowledge) having themselves realized this world and the other world declare it.
  • 'This person consists of the four great essentials [elements]. When one dies, earth enters and rejoins the body of the earth; water enters and rejoins the body of water; fire enters and rejoins the fire; wind enters and rejoins wind: the faculties are transformed into space. With the bier as the fifth, pallbearers carry away the corpse. As far as the cemetery is the body known. The bones whiten. Sacrifices end in ashes. A foolish wisdom is this offering.
  • 'When anyone maintains the existence-doctrine [that there is a result of offering, of skillful and unskillful actions, etc.], it is false, idle talk. Fools and the wise, with the breakup of the body, are annihilated, perish, and do not exist after death.’"

This wrong view is an annihilationist (uccheda) view, and is the same as the view of materialism. When the Buddha explains basic right view (samma-ditthi in the Noble Eightfold Path), he often contrasts it with these common wrong views.

Friday, May 20, 2011

"Right view, right view! What is right view?"

Wisdom Quarterly based on Phra Thanissaro translations (accesstoinsight.org)<span class=
(energyenhancement.org)

"Right view" is the first of the eight factors of the Noble Eightfold Path, belonging to the wisdom division of the path as distinct from the other two divisions, virtue and concentration.

Definition

"What is right view? Ultimately it is fully penetrating the Four Ennobling Truths with insight. Wisdom with regard to suffering (unhappiness, ill, woe, pain, sorrow, distress), the origination of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the way of practice leading to the end of suffering. This is called right view" (DN 22).

Relation to the other Path factors

"And how is right view the forerunner? One discerns false view as false view, and right view as right view. This is one's right view. And what is false view? '[The belief that] there is nothing given, nothing offered, nothing sacrificed. There is no fruit or result of good and bad deeds. There is no this world, no world to come, no [special significance in deeds done towards one's] mother, no father, no instantaneously reborn beings; no brahmins or ascetics who, living rightly and practicing rightly, explain this world and future worlds after having directly known and realized them for themselves.' This is false view...

"One abandons false view to replace it with right view: This is one's right effort. One is mindful to abandon false view to replace it with and maintain right view: This is one's right mindfulness. Thus these three qualities -- right view, right effort, and right mindfulness -- run and around right view" (MN 117).

Consequences of false view

The Ignoble Eightfold Path: "In a person of (1) wrong [incorrect or false] view, (2) wrong intention comes into being. In a person of wrong intention, (3) wrong speech. In a person of wrong speech, (4) wrong action. In a person of wrong action, (5) wrong livelihood. In a person of wrong livelihood, (6) wrong effort. In a person of wrong effort, (7) wrong mindfulness. In a person of wrong mindfulness, (8) wrong concentration. In a person of wrong concentration, wrong knowledge. In a person of wrong knowledge, wrong liberation. This is how wrongness leads to failure not success" (AN 10.103).

Results of right view

The Noble Eightfold Path: "When a person has (1) right view, (2) right intention, (3) right speech, (4) right action, (5) right livelihood, (6) right effort, (7) right mindfulness, (8) right concentration, right wisdom, and right liberation, whatever bodily deeds one undertakes in line with that [correct] view, whatever verbal deeds... whatever mental deeds one undertakes in line with that view, whatever intentions, whatever vows, whatever determinations, whatever fabrications, all lead to what is agreeable, pleasing, welcome, profitable, and uplifting. Why? It is because such view is auspicious.

"Just as when a sugarcane seed, rice grain, or grape seed is placed in moist soil, whatever nutriment it takes from the soil and water, all of that conduces to its sweetness, tastiness, and delectability. Why? It is because the seed is auspicious. In the same way, when a person has right view... right liberation, whatever bodily deeds one undertakes in line with such view, whatever verbal deeds... whatever mental deeds one undertakes in line with such view, whatever intentions, whatever vows, whatever determinations, whatever formations, all lead to what is agreeable, pleasing, welcome, profitable, and uplifting. Why? It is because such view is auspicious" (AN 10.104).

A Thicket of Wrong Views

"There is the case where an uninstructed, ordinary worldling [not acquainted with the liberating Dharma]... does not discriminate and discern which ideas are fit for attention, which unfit. This being so, one does not attend to ideas fit for attention but attends instead to unfit ideas... This is how one attends unprofitably:

  • 'Was I in the past? Was I not in the past?
  • What was I in the past? How was I in the past?
  • Having been what, what was I in the past?
  • Shall I be in the future? Shall I not be in the future?
  • What shall I be in the future? How shall I be in the future?
  • Having been what, what shall I be in the future?'
Or else one is inwardly perplexed about the present:

  • 'Am I? Am I not?
  • What am I? How am I?
  • Where has this being come from?
  • Where is it bound?'

"As one attends unprofitably in this way, one of six kinds of view arises:

  1. The view, I have a self arises as true and established.
  2. Or the view, I have no self...
  3. Or the view, It is by means of self that I perceive self...
  4. Or the view, It is by means of self that I perceive not-self [the impersonal nature of being]...
  5. Or the view, It is by means of not-self that I perceive self arises as true and established.
  6. Or else one forms a view such as: This very self of mine -- the knower who is sensitive here or there to the ripening of good and bad deeds (karma) -- is the self belonging to me that is constant, everlasting, eternal, not subject to change, and will endure forever.
This is called a thicket of views, a wilderness of views, a contortion of views, a writhing of views, a fetter of views.

Bound by a fetter of views, the uninstructed ordinary worldling [not acquainted with the liberating Dharma] is not freed from birth, aging, and death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, and despair. One is not freed, I tell you, from suffering and sorrow.

"But the well-instructed disciple [acquainted with the liberating Dharma] of the noble ones... discriminates and discerns which ideas are fit for attention, which unfit. This being so, such a person does not attend to ideas unfit for attention but attends [instead] to fit ideas... One attends profitably:

  1. This is suffering...
  2. This is the origination of suffering...
  3. This is the end of suffering...
  4. This is the way leading to the end of suffering.
As one attends profitably in this way, three fetters are abandoned: identity-view [the view that there is an eternal self], doubt, and clinging [to the view that liberation is attainable through mere] rites and rituals" (MN 2).

When is knowledge independent of others?

[The monk Kaccayana:] "Venerable sir, 'Right view, right view,' it is said. To what extent is there right view?"

[The Buddha:] "By and large, Kaccayana, this world is supported by [or holds the view of] polemical extremes of existence and non-existence.

"But when one sees the origination of the world [the Five Aggregates of clinging to impersonal material and mental phenomena as a self] as it truly is with right view, 'non-existence' with regard to the world does not occur to one.

"When one sees the cessation of the world as it actually is with right view, 'existence' with regard to the world [the Five Aggregates of being or of existence] does not occur to one.

"By and large, Kaccayana, this world is in bondage to attachments, clingings [sustenances], and biases. But one such as this does not get involved with or cling to these attachments, clingings, fixations of attention, biases, or obsessions. Neither is one resolved on 'myself.'

"One has no doubt or uncertainty that, when there is arising, only suffering and unsatisfactoriness is arising. And when there is passing away, only suffering and unsatisfactoriness is passing away.

"In this, one's knowledge is independent of others. It is to this extent, Kaccayana, that there is right view" (SN 12.15).

Abandoning the unskillful, developing the skillful

[The central message of the Kalama Sutra:] "Do not go by reports, by legends, by traditions, by scriptural authority, by logical inference, by conjecture, by analogies, by agreement through pondering views, by probability, or by the thought, 'This guru is our teacher.'

"But when you yourself know, 'These qualities are unskillful; these qualities are blameworthy; these qualities are condemned by the wise; these qualities, when adopted and performed, lead to harm and to suffering' -- then abandon them...

"When you yourself know, 'These qualities are skillful; these qualities are blameless; these qualities are praised by the wise; these qualities, when adopted and performed, lead to everyone's welfare and happiness' -- then adopt and keep them" (AN 3.65).